Reminds me of this passage from Nassim Taleb's Skin in the Game: > The great Karl Popper often started a discussion with an unerring representation of his oppo

Reminds me of this passage from Nassim Taleb's Skin in the Game: > The great Karl Popper often started a discussion with an unerring representation of his opponent’s positions, often exhaustive, as if he were marketing them as his own ideas, before proceeding to systematically dismantle them. Also, take Hayek’s diatribes Contra Keynes and Cambridge: it was a “contra,” but not a single line misrepresents Keynes or makes an overt attempt at sensationalizing.