3 ms·
Yea you'd at least need to compensate well. Maybe the labels have way here, but they won't benefit from less gatekeeping with AI. An alternative to "watching"
by anotheryou 2y ago
Yea you'd at least need to compensate well.
Maybe the labels have way here, but they won't benefit from less gatekeeping with AI.
An alternative to "watching" someone would be getting the raw input and the final output.
- anotheryou 2y agoOr youtube/spotify allowing for continious AB tests of songs XD
- airstrike 2y agoOh god, please delete this comment! Don't give them ideas! XD
- diggan 2y ago> Yea you'd at least need to compensate well. Again, guessing, but you'd have to compensate them enough to cover expected/dreamed up life-time earnings, it'll quickly balloon to unrealistic levels, considering the amount of data you'd need, from actual professionals.
- whywhywhywhy 2y agoYou don't need data from actual professionals, tools can be trained from the finished product that can make more of the finished product. We know this from AI use in writing, images, voice and video. Ultimately an "AI Ableton" isn't going to look like Ableton, it'll be a simple multitrack editor with a cursor style chat on the side.