4 ms·
Actually, my idea was to promise the pay increases. OK. I stand corrected. What do you do if, halfway through the year, the corporate board tells you to cut s
by gravitycop 18y ago
Actually, my idea was to promise the pay increases.
OK. I stand corrected.
What do you do if, halfway through the year, the corporate board tells you to cut spending? Do you keep your promise to the employees, and risk offending the board? I've had similar continuous-pay-increase ideas, myself, but I'm not sure about promising them up front.
I like the idea of paying partly in equity, by the way. That way the employees are actually part of the company (co-owners), and they can genuinely feel they are building something that is theirs. Maybe the equity payments could be increased over time.
- randallsquared 18y ago"What do you do if, halfway through the year, the corporate board tells you to cut spending?" Whatever you would otherwise have done. If you have to lay people off, you lay people off. Since the yearly pay is known in advance, the only odd bit is the schedule of payments... if you have to lay someone off, you've actually spent less than you would have if all their paychecks are the same. But the details of all this aren't really the point -- I'm sure they could be worked out, if someone wanted to try it. I may if I hire employees at some point. Paying partly in equity seems nice, but it seems even less sustainable than distributing an employee's paycheck unevenly.
- gravitycop 18y agoPaying partly in equity seems nice, but it seems even less sustainable In a company that were not growing, it would indeed be unsustainable to pay in equity (unless the value fo the equity were continuously shrinking. But why would a startup company not be growing (valuation rising)? Unless it is a failure, isn't it normally growing?