3 ms·
Sure, but I don't see much of a difference from importing from China vs. the U.S. in terms of real impact. I don't really care so much for the "lingua franca s
by pcthrowaway 2y ago
Sure, but I don't see much of a difference from importing from China vs. the U.S. in terms of real impact.
I don't really care so much for the "lingua franca status of English" (even though it's the only language I speak fluently). While yes, this is one of Canada's main languages (not that we don't have a lot of Cantonese/Mandarin speakers too), China itself would be a good example that one can succeed without speaking the language which has the "lingua franca status"
Perhaps it's worth noting that the number of fluent Mandarin/Cantonese speakers in Canada is probably not much lower (as a percentage - ~4% in 2016 and I can imagine it's only increased since then) than the number of fluent English speakers in China (5%)
edit: 4% is actually the number of Canadians who spoke Mandarin or Cantonese as a first language in 2016 (which again, is likely higher now). The number of fluent combined Chinese language speakers is almost certainly higher then, even if just a little bit.
- drivebyhooting 2y agoMillions of Chinese learn English in school from a very early age to have access to the global labor market. You have a huge unrecognized privilege in being a native English speaker.
- pcthrowaway 2y agoNot sure why you're making this personal. I do of course realize the privilege in speaking English as a first language, being born in a developed nation, as a white cis-man, and so on. To cling to the idea that English need continue to be the most important global economic language though, is a type of linguistic and economic supremacy I don't care to partake in.
- drivebyhooting 2y agoIf you were playing a strategy game you would definitely value your country’s language remaining the língua franca. The same logic applies in the real world. It’s not personal. It’s the most impersonal thing possible.