4 ms·
Starlink sets up subsidiary in Faroe Islands
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- actionfromafar 1y agoAre they going to annex it too?
- halgir 1y agoEnglish: https://dimma-fo.translate.goog/grein/starlink-vil-veita-internet-i-foroyum-stovnadu-foroyskt-smapartafelag?_x_tr_sl=fo&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp https://dimma-fo.translate.goog/grein/starlink-vil-veita-int...
- nottorp 1y agoHow... unpatriotic?
- yieldcrv 1y ago> a branch in Faroe Islands is a condition for applying for a license to provide telecommunications services according to Faroese law.
- nottorp 1y agoOh, so this is to access the huge Faeroese market. Definitely not for ... creative accounting ... purposes.
- yieldcrv 1y agoeven if it was, nation states are in competition with each other to attract business and capital. some jurisdictions are able to balance their budget by successfully doing that. its for nation states to remember, not citizens to show fealty towards and in that subcontinent, patriotism is often seen as a negative trait outside of football matches
- nanna 1y ago> Now the intention is that Faroese households and businesses can also access this service - subject to approval from the Faroese authorities. One would hope the Faroese administration would put this on ice until the US administration quits its threats to the sovereignty of their fellow autonomous Danish territory of Greenland...
- lxgr 1y ago> One would hope the Faroese administration would put this on ice Why? I totally get not wanting to subsidize it using taxpayer money, not wanting to abandon any other existing or planned infrastructure in favor of it etc., but what do citizens gain by not having legal access to backup infrastructure? It doesn't seem like OneWeb is a viable alternative at this point, so banning the only existing solution seems like a bad idea. You could also ask the people of Saint Helena or the Falkland Islands how they like their respective government bans.