3 ms·
Yeah, there are a lot of positive opinions building around C++11. But, my personal opinion is that, to be in a long run, c++ has to change very fast again!(I me
by zedzedzed 14y ago
Yeah, there are a lot of positive opinions building around C++11.
But, my personal opinion is that, to be in a long run, c++ has to change very fast again!(I mean, the design patterns, to match up with new hardware and expectations).
This is not the case with rust or go!!!
- mhd 14y agoWell, as opposed to things like Prolog or the more esoteric functional languages, those three language aren't too different regarding their basic mindset and ties to machine architecture. Never mind that I don't believe that we're in for a massive change, anyhow (and all three can cope with multi-core in about the same way). Sure, you don't have the legacy libraries and architectural styles of C++ in Rust/Go, but that's a pretty moot point if we're talking about new projects. Go wild with generics, lambdas, concurrency, type inference etc..