7 ms·
News.YC faster (plus new traffic stats)
- pclark 18y agoawesome. News.YC is still my primary source for most news, it's an amazing community.
- unalone 18y agoTwo months ago I was worried that with the Obama surge things would break apart and collapse and become generic as a site like Reddit's become. To my surprise, it's managed to hold together incredibly well. And I love it: this is absolutely the best community I know of on the Internet.
- allenbrunson 18y ago"it" didn't magically hold together. that was the work of the editors! if you read the site with showdead turned on in your profile, you'll see that a record number of users and submissions are getting killed. just to be clear, that's not me screaming censorship. it's rare for me to see a dead comment or submission that i wouldn't have killed myself, if i had the power to do it.
- unalone 18y agoYep! I flag a lot of stuff in the new section. I'm just always surprised to see how effective that is at pruning the site.
- yters 18y agoBesides the excellent moderation, another huge contributor is that instead of being a generic medium for posting articles and discussion, like slashdot, HN is founded on pg, in a sense. His ethos is the site's ethos.
- mixmax 18y agoyes - but without the cult-like persona following that often arises in situations like these. Which both he and us probably thinks is good.
- andreyf 18y agowithout the cult-like persona following To be fair, maybe a little cult-like persona following...
- captainobvious 18y agoAre you trying to get excommunicated?
- DavidPP 18y agoI've been reading News.YC for last few months and it's now my primary source of IT news/discussion. While I restrain myself from posting sometime because I'm not perfectly fluent in english, I have deep admiration for the community and it's insight on the "hacker" world. Thanks alot!
- mixmax 18y agoI think that around here it's more about what you have to say than about being able to do so in perfect english. Besides it's a great way to learn... So if you have something to add the conversation do so. Even if it isn't perfect english :-)
- pmjordan 18y agoIn fact, you're likely to receive a friendly correction on severe grammar or semantic errors.
- simonista 18y agoI agree, and what's more, It feels "livelier" to me lately, which could be the feel of the growing population. I'm not worried though, the discussions have continued to be excellent.
- yan 18y agoThis is great. Are the events that brought in the largest spikes in traffic known? Do page views correlate to new accounts?
- pclark 18y agoI belive the huge spike was techcrunch
- pclark 18y agohmm, that spike was before techcrunch covered YC (they covered it in December) ... no idea, then :)
- pmjordan 18y agoI'm wondering whether the huge page view spikes that have no corresponding unique IP spike are actually caused by crawler traffic.
- robg 18y agoUsually crawler traffic. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=390965 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=390965
- ed 18y agoThe largest spike looks like decision day. (That's the day YC sends out emails notifying the people they'll fund.)
- jskopek 18y agoLong time reader, first time poster. Just wanted to say that the quality of submissions and comments is what always keeps me coming back to HN, and it's great to see active interest in maintaining the quality. You'd never hear something like "Growth can't keep going at this rate forever without ruining the site, though. Between those two alternatives, we prefer growth to slow down. We hope it will happen naturally—that we'll simply run out of new people the site appeals to." coming from a profit-driven site
- ionfish 18y ago> "[W]ith sufficient caching you can write popular apps in arbitrarily slow languages." Somehow I doubt this pronouncement will stem the tide of statements along the lines of "x is written in a slow language and therefore won't scale", although they have been mercifully less frequent around here of late.
- Alex3917 18y agoMaybe it would be helpful if there were a way to see a user's 100 highest rated comments. I'm thinking it would help both in socializing the influx of new users, and also in getting an idea of what a given person like.
- pc 18y agoGood idea.
- mnemonik 18y agoDon't downmod this guy(gal) in to oblivion just because (s)he didn't say too much or you don't agree... Especially in this thread. This should be reserved for trolls. I think a nice 0 or -1 (to discourage pointless comments) would be fine but (s)he's already at -3 when this is still a pretty new submission. Don't hop on the bandwagon just because.
- someperson 18y agoReplying to comment with "Good Idea." serves no purpose. That user's account is nearly 2 years old, they know better than to post that. Pointless comments should be discouraged just as much as trolling should be.
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]
- davi 18y agoCurrently, just clicking on a username and then clicking on the comments link in the user profile gives me a pretty good sense of what that user is like. My highest rated comment so far occurred yesterday, when I got 30 points for saying something reasonably good early on in a popular post. I think other people agreed with what I said, and so (appropriately) just upvoted the comment rather than repeating it. If your proposed feature just ended up displaying lots of comments like these, it might not be that great. A somewhat related idea might be to let longstanding/high karma users add a 'top N favorite comments' list to their profile. When you looked at a user's profile, you could click through to see their favorites, and the comments by them favorited by others. (Users could add their own comments to their favorites list, if they wanted to.) I can think of several users right now whose favorites would be interesting to me.
- robg 18y agoOn a slow satellite connection I definitely noticed the new zippiness. No other site I visit loads as quickly - not even a google search.
- pclark 18y agoI'm curious about a satellite connection. I spend a lot of time in southern Spain where we don't have landlines. We do have GSM so we get _slow_ internet. Can you shed some light on satellite internet? Who are you hosted with? Hows the speed & reliability?
- robg 18y agoWe're with HughesNet. It's bad (200 kbps) at peak times, better at moderate volume (500 kbps), and pretty good at off-hours - 5am (1.5 mbps). We pay about $80 month but it's our only choice besides dial-up. It seems they now have faster connections if you're willing to pay more (http://go.gethughesnet.com/plans.cfm http://go.gethughesnet.com/plans.cfm) Reliability is really good. It's hardly ever down, even during major snowstorms (just have to clean off the dish). I'd say we lose connectivity maybe a few hours a month. The worst part is the low daily bandwidth limits (425 MB in 24 hour periods) and then they throttle the service (<20 kbps) until you're into the next 24 hour period. They don't tell you when you're getting close. Since we started using a bandwidth tracker to monitor ourselves we haven't had any problems but the first few months were painful and frustrating. They do have three non-monitored hours (4am to 7am local time) so you can schedule downloads accordingly. Not sure if they're international though. Be careful of on-line reviews. They're almost all negative because I don't think folks realize the technology is always going to seem more limited than DSL or cable. Coming from either of those (or a T1 etc.), you just have to reset your expectations.
- pclark 18y agothanks a lot - really handy information. I'll look for some global providers. Doesn't seem unreasonably priced, either. Good luck with your venture/startup by the way - sounds fascinating.
- vaksel 18y agowould be interesting to see what kind of hardware HN is hosted on
- robg 18y agoBut we're hoping that, as in past influxes, the new arrivals will with some prodding from the existing inhabitants learn the local customs. I'm absolutely smitten with this form of social hacking. To me, this seems to be the most revolutionary part of the site. That controlling "free" speech is not an impediment to open speech and that community members can be taught, through participation, to behave according to some simple constraints. My apologies if this is an inane realization. It just doesn't seem to be said often enough in on-line communities. Lassez faire doesn't work and it's possible to also encourage the worst, trollish, impulses. This is the first clearly positive example I've seen. If there are others please let me know!
- bd 18y agoMetaFilter also works this way. Self-policing is a big part of the community [1][2]. There is a even a whole section of the site devoted to discussing internal stuff (called appropriately MetaTalk [3]). Sometimes I miss something like this on HN - a separate space for meta stuff. BTW MetaFilter is the only other online community I'm aware of that has quality on the level of HN (despite being even larger - over 56,000 registered people). [1] http://mssv.net/wiki.cgi?SelfPolicing http://mssv.net/wiki.cgi?SelfPolicing [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MetaFilter#Moderation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MetaFilter#Moderation [3] http://metatalk.metafilter.com http://metatalk.metafilter.com
- jballanc 18y agoActually, I kind of like that HN is self-meta (i.e. the ability to ask questions as well as post links). There were a few good discussions about how to make a good post a while back: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=419539 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=419539
- DTrejo 18y agoI think his point was that meta does not have its own section, and that because of this some meta comments are voted down (despite validity, good points, etc).
- 18y ago
- trickjarrett 18y agoDoes anyone else feel like HN is actually ahead of the zeitgeist than other sites like Reddit and Digg? Obviously the focus is closer with technology/entrepreneur articles but I keep finding stories I've already seen on HN hitting Reddit and Digg up to a day later.
- tokenadult 18y agoHN is beating some of the specialty discussion sites I like best in timeliness for certain specialized topics, so it appears that people who find cool links are defaulting to posting to HN first (which is also becoming my default behavior).
- mdasen 18y agoprove that with sufficient caching you can serve arbitrarily large numbers of requests with arbitrarily slow languages I love the way that's worded, but I do have a serious question: how do you do the caching in a way that keeps content fresh? For example, you couldn't just cache this page with the comments because then I'd think mine didn't show up. Or do you add it to a comments cache in memcached or some similar mechanism as well as saving it to the database? Or simply expire the cache on save assuming that there will be more reads than writes? It's always seemed hard to do good caching for a site whose content is constantly changing as people comment and vote on items and it'd be nice to see how complex the model used here was. The latest source I know of is at http://ycombinator.com/arc/arc2.tar http://ycombinator.com/arc/arc2.tar. Will there be an update with new source? Oh, and congratulations on an awesome site!
- staunch 18y ago1) Any idea how many page views per month? 2) Is all the HN data (comments, submissions, users) backed up and stored off the machine it's running on?
- asmosoinio 18y ago1) Looking at the graph from the article: http://ycombinator.com/images/traffic-8dec08.png http://ycombinator.com/images/traffic-8dec08.png For December the average page views per day averages about 200K => 6M page views.
- aristus 18y ago"...with sufficient caching you can serve arbitrarily large numbers of requests with arbitrarily slow languages." Only if the dataset is small relative to the traffic rate, and if the data mutation rate is relatively small to the size of the dataset. There are plenty of systems that do not have these properties. I agree the speed of the language does not matter as much as people used to think... but the shape of the data matters a lot more than people think.
- pmjordan 18y agoThe shape of the data matters particularly when you want to scale beyond that initial single server, which is especially relevant if performance is weak.
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]
- JoelSutherland 18y agoI'd like to see increased moderation to balance the new users.
- Xichekolas 18y agoIf you watch the site with showdead turned on, you'll notice that moderation has increased as the userbase has increased. There are more dead items than ever, but such is life when trying to maintain quality. So in short, you are seeing it.
- fallentimes 18y ago...and there has been a slight uptick in comments that are insulting or inane. Is there a way to measure this? I know someone mentioned a filter for Youtube comments before...
- tokenadult 18y agoOddly, just now my access failed to HN using either of two different browsers, several times, even though other sites that occasionally have traffic hiccups responded just fine.
- gommm 18y agoOne feature I would love news.yc is a page to list only the Ask HN submissions... I like reading articles and seeing the reactions to articles but the Ask HN submission usually end up having higher quality content on average IMHO.
- bd 18y agohttp://ask.searchyc.com http://ask.searchyc.com http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/startupswiki/Ask_YC_Archive http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/startupswiki/Ask_YC_Archive Courtesy of chengmi, alaskamiller and epi0Bauqu
- medianama 18y agoWhy is the alexa rank so low for the kind of traffic this site gets?
- zack 18y agoHN is still very slow for me... the top orange toolbar always loads quickly on the homepage, but then the stories take ~10seconds to load...it's annoying.
- unalone 18y agoI don't know if this is because of the new fix, but for me submission pages won't load. Any user's submission page just freezes. Safari 4, OS X 10.5.6. Edit: never mind, working now. Possibly an Internet malfunction.
- prakash 18y agoSo we just finished a new round of optimizations as part of our ongoing quest to prove that with sufficient caching you can ..... PG, can you please list the various optimizations? Thanks!
- ced 18y agoI realized today that caching breaks one of Lisp's cardinal rules (as quoted from OnLisp): The convention in Lisp seems to be that an invocation owns objects it receives as return values, but not objects passed to it as arguments. How do experienced Lispers deal with this? Just being careful?