3 ms·
from what I've seen over the past few years, a surprising effect of this conversation has demotivated a whole generation of people. its a mixture of nihilism an
by yieldcrv 2y ago
from what I've seen over the past few years, a surprising effect of this conversation has demotivated a whole generation of people. its a mixture of nihilism and demotivation.
like with the 'privilege' discussion, even when defined as 'fewer roadblocks', people just realize they weren't born in one socioeconomic bracket so there's no point in bothering.
I'm surprised because when I look at some individual circumstances, I see lots of opportunity available to them that they can't perceive. They didn't 'check their privilege' at all, actually, despite telling trust funders of certain phenotypes that.
Play the cards you're dealt, but actually look at the cards.
On the same vein, there are plenty of people with all of the necessary resources and subsidies that do nothing with their life. Fall into substance abuse, or derailed in some other ways. Many now choose to marginalize themselves in order to "live their truth". Which means someone financially successful or acknowledged for their contributions can still be celebrated for playing the cards they were dealt.
- theGnuMe 2y agoThe joke is that meritocracy is something that only people accepted to Stanford believe in.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoWhich is the problem. Why bother leaving the couch or going to school if you can't be the next Bill Gates without some luck. Might as well be going into impoverished schools and cancel classes because math and reading or any other measure of capability has been proven to have zero impact on life outcomes.
- theGnuMe 2y agoThe alternative is not nihilism.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoThe thrust of my point is that it would not be factually correct to assert such a thing. Behavior, effort, knowledge, and discipline matter. Even if it is in a probabistic sense.