1. AI so far has moved us exactly oppositely from solving poverty and disease. In my opinion their ownership structures and their design prevent them from ever

1. AI so far has moved us exactly oppositely from solving poverty and disease. In my opinion their ownership structures and their design prevent them from ever being a positive force let alone "solving" it. 2. At a high enough level, isn't helping other people the most valid possible source of meaning? Finding beauty and sharing it? If AI can somehow impossibly replace humans ability to ever help another human then we are done. No meaning is possible. Nothing matters. The article writes like this is an inevitability and I think that's weird and wrong.