4 ms·
My unqualified guess: something to do with the Sun386i, an x86 Sun workstation which ran a port of SunOS and could virtualise MS-DOS. http://en.wikipedia.org/w
by andrewf 14y ago
My unqualified guess: something to do with the Sun386i, an x86 Sun workstation which ran a port of SunOS and could virtualise MS-DOS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun386i http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun386i
- Zenst 14y agoYou may very well be right, though I would of expected some (c) signs in the source (assembler). Sadly I don't have access to those sources any more, so I won't be able to verify it. Also more I think about it the more I believe it was 4.x I saw and that with what you pointed out about Sun may very well be the case, especialy given the additions to volume ID'd (more than one disc) being added for that version. One day the source may officialy be publicly available and that will be a interesting day. That said it does appear as if the 6.x source code was leaked and illegaly available from a quick google, but that's another story.