3 ms·
Yeah I mean - haven't we already been doing this a decade with home voice assistant speaker things and all found them to be underwhelming? Theres 1-5 things an
by steveBK123 2y ago
Yeah I mean - haven't we already been doing this a decade with home voice assistant speaker things and all found them to be underwhelming?
Theres 1-5 things any individual finds them useful for (timers/lights/music/etc) and then.. thats it.
99.9% of what I use a computer for its far faster to type/click/touch my phone/tablet/computer.
- ryandrake 2y agoI think a lot of these "voice assistant" systems are envisioned and pushed by senior leadership in companies like SVPs and VPs. They're the ones who make the decision to invest in products like this. Why do they think these products make sense? Because they themselves have personal assistants and nannies and chauffeurs and private chefs, and voice is their primary interface to these people. It makes sense that people who spend all their time vocally telling others to do work, think that voice is a good interface for regular people to tell their computers to do work.
- steveBK123 2y agoThat is actually a very interesting take I've not seen before and does make some sense. If your work revolves about telling people what to do and asking questions, a voice assistant seems like a great idea (even if you yourself wouldn't have to stoop to using a robotic version since you have a real live human). If your work actually involves doing things, then voice/conversational text interface quickly falls apart.