I’m a PM and pride myself in specs that give the right level of detail, where “right” can vary hugely depending on context. But I still get lazy with LLMs and

I’m a PM and pride myself in specs that give the right level of detail, where “right” can vary hugely depending on context. But I still get lazy with LLMs and fall into iteration the way bad PM/eng teams do. “Write a SQL query to look at users by gesture by month”. “Now make the time unit a parameter”. “Now pivot the features to columns”. “Now group features hierarchically”. “Now move the feature table to a WITH”. My point and takeaway is that LLMs are endlessly patient and pretty quick to turn requirements around, so they lend themselves to exploration more than human teams do. Agile, I guess, to a degree that we don’t even aspire to in the human world because it would be very expensive and lead to fisticuffs.