4 ms·
and that the model surely used his films as data. While I don't doubt it's true, this could be challenging to prove, because Studio Ponoc (ex-Ghibli) has produ
by JohnBooty 2y ago
and that the model surely used his films as data.
While I don't doubt it's true, this could be challenging to prove, because Studio Ponoc (ex-Ghibli) has produced work that uh, hews rather closely to Miyazaki's style. Were the models trained on Ghibli, Ponoc, both, something else, etc?
I mean, I have no doubts. But proving it seems tough!
- leoh 2y agoWell they then stole from Ponoc, too, right?
- aredox 2y agoPonoc is made of former Ghibli employees who founded a new home when Ghibli's future was uncertain. I am sure they are on friendly terms, if not family, with Ghibli: they worked together for years. People like them can have a gentleman's agreement. What is OpenAI in all this, if not a greedy, sloppy, soulless outsider stealing their Art and effort for financial gain without ever asking for permission?
- JohnBooty 2y agoI don't disagree with anything you said, but it doesn't seem to follow from what I wrote. I pointed out a reason why litigation could be difficult. I'm quite sure nothing I wrote could have been seen as defending OpenAI. Just that I felt litigation would be tricky.
- Cthulhu_ 2y agoI gathered the Japanese government legalized using copyrighted works to train AI last year: https://www.privacyworld.blog/2024/03/japans-new-draft-guidelines-on-ai-and-copyright-is-it-really-ok-to-train-ai-using-pirated-materials/ https://www.privacyworld.blog/2024/03/japans-new-draft-guide...