3 ms·
The harm comes from AI "entrepreneurs" making a business out of cloning Miyazaki's style - and the styles of countless lesser known artists - and flooding the m
by krapp 2y ago
The harm comes from AI "entrepreneurs" making a business out of cloning Miyazaki's style - and the styles of countless lesser known artists - and flooding the market with garbage that cheapens the value of the original work and undermines the market for human talent. And from the people in the AI community who are already claiming this is superior to the original and celebrating the death of human art. And from the likelihood that people will become dependent on this technology - which will be forced down our throats whether we want it or not - and consider themselves artists having never bothered to learn how to express themselves or develop their own talent, or even be allowed the tools to do so beyond the bounds of what an AI intermediary allows.
No one cares about your family photos. This isn't about you.
- SamPatt 2y ago>No one cares about your family photos. This isn't about you. My wife cares. That was the point of my comment.
- krapp 2y agoThe point of your comment was to imply that because you personally made some AI photos for your wife, and it made you happy, any argument that AI art could be harmful was null and void. You're like the person who comes into threads about gun violence and says they don't see what the problem is, since they only shoot watermelons in their backyard. Like, OK. You refuse to recognize the bigger issues at play, noted.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- tehjoker 2y agoWhat if the concept of art was like a gun?