3 ms·
Pre-Trump, I had a paid online subscription to Guardian for a time, because it was so well written and informative. After 2016, however, they seemed to adopt a
by blisterpeanuts 2y ago
Pre-Trump, I had a paid online subscription to Guardian for a time, because it was so well written and informative.
After 2016, however, they seemed to adopt a firm anti-MAGA stance which I found to be biased and off-putting. Their highly critical stance against Israel after the Hamas attacks of October 2023 was the last straw.
Then, they withdrew from the X platform and now they might as well not exist, as far as I'm concerned. I think that was a mistake, given their significant following on X, but I guess they felt they don't need it.
- Symbiote 2y agoTheir stance regarding Israel and Palestine is well within the mainstream in Europe, including the UK. How has the NY Times reported this? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/31/israel-killed-15-palestinian-paramedics-and-rescue-workers-one-by-one-says-un https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/31/israel-killed-...
- Hikikomori 2y agoWhy wouldn't they be critical of Israel? They killed over 200 children in one day just last week.
- spencerflem 2y agoFunny, I started following the Guardian around then as it was the only paper that had a common sense takes on Israel instead of the highly compromised ones like the NY Times.