3 ms·
This is unfortunate. I've been mainly using Postgres so luckily avoided the issues you speak of. I guess yet another reason towards the bucket of "why use Postg
by neonsunset 2y ago
This is unfortunate. I've been mainly using Postgres so luckily avoided the issues you speak of. I guess yet another reason towards the bucket of "why use Postgres/MariaDB instead".
- jiggawatts 2y ago> luckily avoided the issues you speak of That may be a bit of an assumption. I've been perpetually surprised by expectation-versus-reality, especially in the database world where very few people publish comparative benchmarks because of the "DeWitt clause": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_DeWitt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_DeWitt Additionally, a lot of modern DevOps abstractions are most decidedly not zero cost! Containers, Envoys, Ingress, API Management, etc... all add up rapidly, to the point where most applications can't utilise even 1/10th of one CPU core for a single user. The other 90% of the time is lost to networking overheads. Similarly, the typical developers' concept of "fast" doesn't align with mine. My notion of "fast" is being able to pump nine billion bits per second through a 10 Gbps Ethernet link. I've had people argue until they're blue in the face that that is unrealistic.