4 ms·

I've noticed that the attacks are quite vague and consist of demanding some sort of proof that PJ is not engaged this or that (e.g. eating babies.) Also, there'

by madrona 14y ago

I've noticed that the attacks are quite vague and consist of demanding some sort of proof that PJ is not engaged this or that (e.g. eating babies.) Also, there's some ridiculous notion that she hides behind a pseudonym because she uses her initials as her nom de plume. See: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4014768 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4014768 , you might want to select the page text so you can decipher the downvoted comments.

lmm 14y ago
"PJ" really is a pseudonym (and I think it's fair to call it that even if we now know who she is); per her own post (http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20050414214437589 http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20050414214437...) she'd originally intended to remain anonymous.
- deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]