No, but there are some troubling patterns. Read Brandenburg v. Ohio and then read Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project. While it is protected to advocate terror

No, but there are some troubling patterns. Read Brandenburg v. Ohio and then read Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project. While it is protected to advocate terrorism and even genocide against African Americans to fellow KKK members under the First Amendment, it is not protected suggest to Hamas that they would be better off abandoning terrorism. Of course a different way to read this is that the law takes a harsher look at terrorism against whites than against blacks. Or one might see the court as eroding first amendment guarantees. It is all in how you look at it.