2 ms·

980k in 1963, off a population of 53m. 775k in 2008, off a population of 62m. I feel like you're bending over backwards to pretend you don't understand the po

• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• philipallstar 2y ago
  > 980k in 1963, off a population of 53m. ONS[0] shows deaths of around 550k at the same time. > 775k in 2008, off a population of 62m. Same ONS chart shows more like 720k births, and 500k deaths as well. > I feel like you're bending over backwards to pretend you don't understand the point. Just as the 700k immigration figure I mentioned above I did so in good faith, making it net migration, I think you should operate in good faith as well and talk about net natural population change. [0] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/articles/trendsinbirthsanddeathsoverthelastcentury/2015-07-15#0b7-4d81-b22c-fd48a7a596eb https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsde...
  • flir 2y ago
    > I think you should operate in good faith as well and talk about net natural population change. I did, right at the top when I used this link: https://www.statista.com/statistics/281296/uk-population/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/281296/uk-population/ The comment you originally replied to, I think?