4 ms·
The author points out near the bottom that “performance” was not one of the original justifications for its UB decisions, afatct. Your example is a slippery sl
by hn-acct 2y ago
The author points out near the bottom that “performance” was not one of the original justifications for its UB decisions, afatct.
Your example is a slippery slope but I get your point. I agree that there needs to be a “reasonable UB”
But I’ve moved on from c++.
- tialaramex 2y ago> I agree that there needs to be a “reasonable UB” What could you possibly want "reasonable UB" for? If what you want is actually just Implementation Defined that already exists and is fine, no need to invent some notion of "reasonable UB".