3 ms·
Not it is not and it is also contradicting the definition of freedom of speech, first sentence: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech https://en.wi
by raxxorraxor 2y ago
Not it is not and it is also contradicting the definition of freedom of speech, first sentence:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech
"Consequences" are to be understood as sanctions or censorship, or does it mean something different to you? Then please elaborate.
Doesn't make a popular XKCD wrong, but it makes some ideas rather stupid.
- spiderfarmer 2y agoAgain, the First Amendment protects individuals from government censorship, not actions taken by private entities.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- raxxorraxor 2y agoYes, the first amendment is restricted to that, but you proposed some statement would be supportive of freedom of speech. But instead it is contradictory to the definition.