4 ms·
Not a Chemist but reminded me about this article: https://gizmodo.com/chlorine-trifluoride-the-chemical-that-sets-fire-to-as-1715935811 https://gizmodo.com/chlo
by IlikeKitties 2y ago
Not a Chemist but reminded me about this article: https://gizmodo.com/chlorine-trifluoride-the-chemical-that-sets-fire-to-as-1715935811 https://gizmodo.com/chlorine-trifluoride-the-chemical-that-s...
> Just to get the ball rolling, here’s a few of the more unusual things chlorine trifluoride is known to set fire to on contact: glass, sand, asbestos, rust, concrete, people, pyrex, cloth, and the dreams of children…
- LorenPechtel 2y agoMakes me wonder if it could burn a fire elemental. :) They seem to model any chemical damage as "acid" and fire elementals aren't immune to acid so I would be inclined to say it would.
- btilly 2y agoDerek Lowe also did chlorine trifluoride: https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/sand-won-t-save-you-time https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/sand-won-t-save-yo....
- CommieBobDole 2y ago"It is also hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers"
- gmueckl 2y agoThis is a quote from "Ignition!" The particular quoted passage from that book is one of the highlights of the unique ironic tone the author used to describe real and dangerous chemical research. The book firmly establishes its tone with the first two pictures at the front: a successful rocket engine test and the remaining rubble of the same test stand after a failed test.
- banannaise 2y agoI suppose Derek's writing style is similar enough that it's easy to accidentally credit him for that line. I have to wonder whether Clark's influence is a significant contributor to his writing style. It would be fun to ask him. They could, of course, have come to it independently.
- borski 2y agoHe wrote that one too, heh: https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/sand-won-t-save-you-time https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/sand-won-t-save-yo... It’s linked in the article
- QuesnayJr 2y agoThat's a different article. The Gizmodo article has a byline of "Melissa" and apparently is originally from TodayIFoundOut.com.
- groby_b 2y agoSo, might be "inspiration". I suspect "Melissa" did not "find out today" - chlorine trifluoride isn't exactly the stuff you discuss at your average dinner table. You need a whole bunch of expertise to write about it. Gizmodo does not usually have this expertise, but its writers do usually recognize snappy writing that might go viral.
- anotherboffin 2y agoYeah, I suspect “Melissa” fed Lowe’s article to an LLM to get a quick article that’s sure to get views.
- messe 2y agoIn 2015? 2 years before "Attention Is All You Need"?
- anotherboffin 2y agoGood point! I’ll be more careful before quick posting.
- banannaise 2y agoAh, I miss the days when this sort of soft plagiarism required a minimal level of effort and even some genuine research. It might even rise to the level of "acceptable" if she cited her sources more thoroughly. Sadly, as presented, her choice of both anecdotes and example materials makes it pretty clear that the author is mostly just rearranging Lowe's and Clark's words.
- speed_spread 2y agoKnowing that rust can burn should make the joy of a few Linux maintainers.