3 ms·
Interpretations of QM are philosophy. That's why there's no consensus regarding them, unlike the underlying equations.
by red75prime 2y ago
Interpretations of QM are philosophy. That's why there's no consensus regarding them, unlike the underlying equations.
- resource0x 2y agoThe ontological status of the equations is still unclear. BTW, if you can provide a link to your own essay, I would be interested :-)
- anakaine 2y agoWhy assume that someone has written their own essay on such a topic? After this commemt chain it comes across as both dismissive and arrogant.
- resource0x 2y agoWhy did I assume someone has written an essay? Because he said so! Quoting: > I do like his ideas (and I wrote similar things about platonic forms elsewhere) What is dismissive about my interest to his write-up? (I'm sure it was a misunderstanding on your part, you don't need to apologize :-))