> All research is met on HN by people who know better and will tell you why it's flawed It is almost certainly flawed, and it is probably wrong: https://journa

> All research is met on HN by people who know better and will tell you why it's flawed It is almost certainly flawed, and it is probably wrong: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/jo... If you are discussing research at all it is important to discuss the flaws too. The alternative I can see would be to take every published paper as proven true even though we know this is not the case.