> What precedent are we setting by explicitly making "murder someone" a viable path to making progress on your personal political agenda? I think you got it ba

> What precedent are we setting by explicitly making "murder someone" a viable path to making progress on your personal political agenda? I think you got it backwards. The question you should be asking yourself is why did so many Americans supported and even applauded the idea of murdering a CEO of a medical insurance company. You barely get this level of reaction from condemning sadistic murderers with the death penalty. But when it happened to a specific CEO of a specific healthcare company, you saw a wave of popular support across the US. Why do you think regular working people leading regular working class lives enthusiastically applauded it?