I presume you are familiar with the standard counter argument that the Constitution says "elected" rather than "serve"? Here's a Constitutional law professor a

I presume you are familiar with the standard counter argument that the Constitution says "elected" rather than "serve"? Here's a Constitutional law professor arguing 25 years ago that Bill Clinton was constitutionally eligible to run again as VP: https://web.archive.org/web/20051001004410/http://archives.cnn.com/2000/LAW/08/columns/fl.dorf.goreclinton.08.01/ https://web.archive.org/web/20051001004410/http://archives.c... It's easy to claim that Trump running as VP would violate the spirit of the 12th amendment, but I think there is genuine doubt as to how the Supreme Court might rule. Separately, could you contact me by the email in my profile? I've got a (mostly unrelated) question I've been meaning to ask you. No hurry.