2 ms·
There are no published facts aside from this guys missing, so there can be no adequate accounting of the facts. You've misused Occam's Razor.
by trod1234 2y ago
There are no published facts aside from this guys missing, so there can be no adequate accounting of the facts.
You've misused Occam's Razor.
- soulofmischief 2y agoYeah, good example of the maximum entropy principle, [0] in which "the selected distribution is the one that makes the least claim to being informed beyond the stated prior data, that is to say the one that admits the most ignorance beyond the stated prior data", a.k.a. the most entropy. Occam's Razor must still be constrained to known facts, and you cannot construct a "simplest answer" out of data you simply do not have. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_maximum_entropy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_maximum_entropy
- CodeWriter23 2y agoThere's plenty of other public information. The FBI was searching his house for undisclosed reasons, so most definitely they have some kind of investigation open on him. And his degrees were issued by universities in Nanjing and Shanghai, China, strongly suggesting he is a Chinese National, perhaps naturalized to the United States. That was known at the time of my post. We now also know now at the time of his escape, Indiana University had terminated his Professorship. And has continued to disavow he and his wife. I did not misuse Occam's razor, my knowledge of public facts simply exceeded yours.
- trod1234 2y agoYou have a vivid imagination. The facts do not necessarily support what you claimed. Occam's razor requires an adequate accounting of the facts, not speculation. All you have mentioned is speculation, and the facts you have mentioned don't support this narrative, neither when you first mentioned it, nor now. You misused it, and trying to falsely justify that you didn't is deluding yourself.