4 ms·
> He never said that malloc and free are irrelevant. It would be a good point if it was true. Jeff's basically said as much going as far as calling C an "obso
by lbrandy 18y ago
> He never said that malloc and free are irrelevant.
It would be a good point if it was true.
Jeff's basically said as much going as far as calling C an "obsolete" language and saying it is not worth learning. He said he doesn't know C and sees no reason to learn it. Is that not the definition of calling malloc and free irrelevant?
- statictype 18y agoum, I'm talking about this particular post of his that you specifically quoted. I'm not talking about his general position on learning 'C' (which I also disagree with)