3 ms·
> How would this even work? A good question that I don't have a good answer for. I don't have anything really against individual investors taking a risk on a
by cogman10 2y ago
> How would this even work?
A good question that I don't have a good answer for.
I don't have anything really against individual investors taking a risk on a private business. However, I have big issues with there being a large market for these risks to be traded, swapped, and financialized.
That's where I see most of the danger, it isn't the first hand selling of equity but rather having a literal market for such equity. I shouldn't be able to short kim's coffee shop.
> it's far less clear why institutions can't be trusted to do their own due diligence before engaging in a trade.
Because they, frankly, aren't trustworthy. How much money by VC firms has been dumped into obvious ponzi schemes such as FTX?
The issue I have with institutions is they aren't concerned with due diligence, they are concerned with turning a profit. That means they are more than happy to turn a blind eye to obvious company problems if they think they can get in and out before a meltdown (IE, pump and dump).
- Ekaros 2y agoThe whole rewarding model for these institutions reads like pure scam if you apply any cynicism. Make money win or lose. Make even more money when "win" even if all that win is purely on paper. And if you lose just roll the stuff under some new name that happened to win. Record looks good. Even if other records were losers... At least with publicly traded stocks you can have substantial market depth so valuations can be "real". But move to private equity and well even that little goes away...