3 ms·
> The "python devs wanted to write a low level high perf language" was derogatory suggesting that those authors didn't know what they were doing I didn't mean
by jpc0 2y ago
> The "python devs wanted to write a low level high perf language" was derogatory suggesting that those authors didn't know what they were doing
I didn't mean it as derogatory at all actually, more a matter of it's being pushed to developers that have never used a systems level language and had to deal with the types of algorithms at the systems level, and actually most of them can even do it because the abstractions are great. But those same developers can't see how those abstractions could be implemented and wouldn't know where to look.
Hey at least this chain of comments has helped me understand my dislike of where Rust is positioned and as I said in another comment the language authors are makeing the necessary changes to appease people like me, I'm happy to hear about the corouting mechanic because it adds another checkbox that Rust is at the very least trying to position itself correctly.
You are the first rust "evangelist" that I've had he privilege to chat with that actually didn't make me want to drop the language and go back to C++.
You pointed out where rust is strong without just shouting "you are holding it wrong". Thanks for the great experience.
- vlovich123 2y agoNeat. I think Rust even today basically is good enough to almost never touch c++ again. The strengths outmatch the weaknesses significantly and you end up at a significantly higher output velocity because the software is more stable and higher quality. > I didn't mean it as derogatory at all actually, more a matter of it's being pushed to developers that have never used a systems level language and had to deal with the types of algorithms at the systems level, and actually most of them can even do it because the abstractions are great. But those same developers can't see how those abstractions could be implemented and wouldn't know where to look. While there are certainly people who came to Rust from higher languages and Rust’s safety guarantees makes system- level programming more accessible, the language authors and many early users are very clearly systems engineers and understand the space. That’s why noalias is such a critical part of the language and it turned out that LLVM implemented that incorrectly in a bunch of places because no c++ code actually exercised that attribute all that much (and the noalias is a good chunk of the reason why a straight port of c/c++ code often ends up performing slightly better). Rust is the first language I’ve seen where I’d feel comfortable designing a high performance system and then having someone with a web background also contributing without creating all sorts of problems. That’s why network just is impossible in c++