3 ms·
It's interesting especially because it seems like companies today pour tens of millions into "accessibility", but I never see a thing's usability in terms of si
by hyperbrainer 2y ago
It's interesting especially because it seems like companies today pour tens of millions into "accessibility", but I never see a thing's usability in terms of simple and easy-to-do-what-I-want UX fall in to the same category.
- rafram 2y agoOne is required by law and/or contract terms, the other is just nice to have.
- layer8 2y agoAnd that is why we can’t have nice things, apparently.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- cenamus 2y agoEven just simple UX testing with people that have never seen or used your software seems to be a lost art.
- hnthrowaway0315 2y agoCompanies are outsourcing testing. I'm not surprised that they get rid of UI testing. Back in the day companies used to invite people to sit down and use their software. Nowadays they just push out whatever they have and then start collecting bug tickets. Then they let the community to vote on the tickets. It's basically a huge "pay for being a beta tester" scheme.
- ivan_gammel 2y agoUX testing is not UI testing and it is not QA.
- hnthrowaway0315 2y agoYou are probably right, just saying in general...
- girvo 2y agoQuite, but lots of companies jam them all together these days.