> It would be good to figure out how many people actually care about printability. The final goal is to do mass prints of Paged Out! to give out at events. We'

> It would be good to figure out how many people actually care about printability. The final goal is to do mass prints of Paged Out! to give out at events. We've already done that once, and we're chatting with sponsors and events about doing more of this. And actually "how can I get a printed issue" is THE most common question we get from readers. So there's interest in a printed version from both sides (readers + our team). With regards to the HTML idea – it was something I considered as well (and an idea I come back to from time to time). The issues that made me decide against it are: - Not everyone knows HTML/CSS on a level that would allow them to express what they want. This would downgrade the "creativeness" of layouts. While some typical text processors or WYSIWYG editors can output decent HTML, that's not true across the board. - Asking authors to do more work (especially to fight with making sure HTML behaves correctly when printing to PDF), would have a negative effect – I a significant chunk of authors would pull out. - It does solve readability issues for typical text layouts. It doesn't solve them for more creative layouts, especially on mobile phones. - For better or worse almost every newsletter, blog, news website, etc on the internet uses HTML format. I think I prefer PO! to stay in the magazine category. Anyway, I'm going to be revisiting this idea from time to time, especially if PO! happens to get more funding for whatever reason.