2 ms·
> Here in Sweden we decided against fluoride for this reason and the fact that it is in fact toxic. How? Please don't express that it damages development. Tha
by PartiallyTyped 2y ago
> Here in Sweden we decided against fluoride for this reason and the fact that it is in fact toxic.
How?
Please don't express that it damages development. That's trivially refutable by statistics. We can compare Canada's and UK's IQs for example, or some other proxy to the G factor, said countries were chosen for their similar cultural demographics, we find then that the metrics are mostly identical, while the difference in consumption of fluoride is staggering.
- impossiblefork 2y agohttps://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/EHP14534 https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/EHP14534 is one study. We did earlier studies in the 50s when we made the decision to only use fluoride orally.
- cyanydeez 2y agodoesn't discuss any confounding variables that may also correlate with the use/disuse of flouride.
- PartiallyTyped 2y agoSo anyone willing to tell me how this constitutes a low quality comment that warrants this reception?