3 ms·
It’s basically coping responses from people who are starting to realize they have been loudly wrong for years. It’s a fairly human response I suppose. They’ll g
by kelipso 2y ago
It’s basically coping responses from people who are starting to realize they have been loudly wrong for years. It’s a fairly human response I suppose. They’ll get over it eventually after they go through the stages of grief or whatever.
- ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7 2y ago> coping responses No? What is a coping response? I asked the commenter to provide context to their links that supposedly show evidence for what the initial question was (does fluoride at the concentrations in drinking water cause harm), which they definitely do not show evidence for.
- kelipso 2y agoThe thing is you are not being curious. You are basically putting your head in the sand and goading at people to drag it out for you.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> You are basically putting your head in the sand and goading at people to drag it out for you Nah. I pretty much agree with what Utah is doing here (though I’d prefer just not mandating it and making the decision as local as it needs to be). OP’s link list looks AI generated. That’s just not a good-faith comment.
- kelipso 2y agoOP has already said that it was not AI generated and that he spent months doing due diligence to compile that list. I suppose you want a summary, well read the abstracts of the papers. It's not that challenging, is it?
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> OP has already said that it was not AI generated They first went defensive when asked about it up thread [1]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43519312 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43519312
- otterley 2y agoYou need to stop attacking people on HN. It's not permitted here. You are free to disagree with their statements and positions, but making character judgments like this is not OK.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]