I use LLM in my workflow a lot, however it never occurred to me there's any vibe until this online running joke. And no, the vibe is largely the same as befor

I use LLM in my workflow a lot, however it never occurred to me there's any vibe until this online running joke. And no, the vibe is largely the same as before, there was google, then stackoverflow, and then now here's an AI that would most likely take care of the specific question and generate boilerplate if you frame the question correctly. Framing the question correctly isn't a vibe, it requires logical thinking that feels almost like coding, and results need to be checked. Even then, I usually don't go a day without spotting some sort of hallucination (correcting obvious wrongs during prompting doesn't count). And testing is essential because sometimes that's how you can catch this kind of hallucination. I do find learning in terms of project and even coding itself improves a lot faster with a capable LLM. It introduces a lot of idiomatic ways to code, and provides a lot of practice to fix whatever didn't work or add things that are just easier to type then asking it to fix.