> So the conjecture from the article that the mac mini isn't powerful enough is false Not what the article says... and that doesn't follow anyways. The remote

> So the conjecture from the article that the mac mini isn't powerful enough is false Not what the article says... and that doesn't follow anyways. The remote experience was terrible and the non-remote experience wasn't shown at all. How fast the Mac Mini theoretically is doesn't matter at all once you have such an insane bottleneck. > And based on other comments here, this is a pretty common way to do things. And? The industry is making a mistake by knee-capping its editors. It's going into seconds-per-frame territory in the video, it's as close to unusable as you can get. The article seemed to definitively prove its case that someone desperately needs to step back and look at what the requirements for these editors actually are, rather than ramming conflicting demands into each other to appease the anti-piracy insurance mobsters.