3 ms·

I'd keep an eye on Roc https://www.roc-lang.org/ https://www.roc-lang.org/ Also, Elixir is working on gradual types, which is something I would keep an eye on.

• no_wizard 2y ago
  I want Clojure on Rust, or a similar LISP. Such a great programming paradigm that sadly has few breakout successes
  • whytevuhuni 2y ago
    I'm having a hard time picturing that. What would it look like?
    • no_wizard 2y ago
      Like Clojure having access to the Java ecosystem it would need access to the Rust ecosystem I imagine. I otherwise am unsure what you mean
• cultofmetatron 2y ago
  roc as a language looks really interesting but its by elm devs and I don't have much confidence in their ability to handle the transition to being a widely used language with all the cultural shifts that requires.
  • Hasnep 2y ago
    It's created by Richard Feldman who was big in the Elm community, but I think most contributors to the Roc compiler have only used Elm a bit or have never used it.
  • rapind 2y ago
    I hear ya, but Elm allowed me to eject out of the javascript churn for the past 7 years while still building some slick UIs that basically never fall over. I literally don’t know or care what the current hotness is in javascript, and that’s how I like it. If roc ends up being even close to that productive for me, I really don’t care how widespread it is. I like these thoughtful unrushed languages that I can support for years without stress.
    • cultofmetatron 2y ago
      > but Elm allowed me to eject out of the javascript churn for the past 7 years while still building some slick UIs that basically never fall over. Thats the real tragedy. Elm was a good language but the culture around it means it could never achieve critical adoption. It is great technology for building frontends but how easily will I be able to maintain that app as the web changes over the years?
      • rapind 2y ago
        I can only speak from experience, but it's been absolutely solid, incredibly easy to maintain (because there's been so little change), and I don't feel like I missed out on any groundbreaking front end tech at all. I literally have some elm code that's been in production doing it's thing for 7+ years without any maintenance, but more importantly it's not scary to open it up and make changes 7 years later either. I doubt it's a silver bullet for everyone, but it's been phenomenal for me as a solo dev w/ my own product. I feel so much better about my elm code than I do about my React code. I have to do all the other things, like marketing, sales, training, support, back end, etc. It's nice to launch a UI and know it'll last (and also that it's easy to refactor and augment too!). Elm has turned my into a statically typed functional fanboy. It's been a gateway drug to Haskell, OCaml, and F#. I see the same promise with Roc, although I bet Richard will update it more frequently than Evan w/ elm after 1.0.
      • poulpy123 2y ago
        which culture and why it cased problems ? honest question, I barely heard of elm
  • pmarreck 2y ago
    FYI roc is in the early stages of a complete rewrite from Rust to Zig and... that may take a while. I'm messing with Nim in the meantime for some commandline tooling