> Whoa there - those are very different claims! I suspect that the stronger claim is true - but even the weaker claim would invalidate the article's statements

> Whoa there - those are very different claims! I suspect that the stronger claim is true - but even the weaker claim would invalidate the article's statements that "existing programming languages have little or no subtyping" and that OOP was a "fad" and has been left in the past.