4 ms·
Arch has many other benefits, like Pacman arguably being nicer to use than e.g. APT, and AUR having a wider range of easily installable packages than even Ubunt
by setopt 2y ago
Arch has many other benefits, like Pacman arguably being nicer to use than e.g. APT, and AUR having a wider range of easily installable packages than even Ubuntu PPAs, and less patching of upstream packages.
Manjaro just makes it more approachable for people who don’t want to set it up themselves, similarly to what Ubuntu did to Debian.
- ChocolateGod 2y agoArch has a shell based installer, why use Manjaro over that?
- z3ratul163071 2y agoArch does not have a shell based installer. If by shell-based installer you mean: you manually run a bunch of sequential shell commands, then yes. For me that does not constitute 'an installer'.
- NekkoDroid 2y agoIt does: archinstall. Its been a thing for I think 2 years now.