4 ms·

> I can be, but not with an obviously dishonest user like yourself. Dishonest how? By holding views you disagree with? I’ve engaged on a good faith effort so

by refurb 2y ago

> I can be, but not with an obviously dishonest user like yourself. Dishonest how? By holding views you disagree with? I’ve engaged on a good faith effort so far and your first response was to act like my questions were some nefarious action. I’m not sure one can actually discussion complex topics without questions. Then when I respond nicely you come back to tell me to “fuck off”. I’m not sure what set you off, but I don’t think any of it is deserved.

elktown 2y ago
> It doesn't require a sociology degree to pattern-match your comment history. ^^^^ > Then when I respond nicely you come back to tell me to “fuck off”. I did not.
- refurb 2y ago
  Instead of replying with reasons why you won’t engage in a respectful discussion you could just downvote and move on. Like I said it would save both of us a lot of time.
  - elktown 2y ago
    Sealioning is not respectful discussion. A respectful person would've taken the burden onto themselves of offering counter-evidence instead of firing off a barrage of obstinate questions.
    - refurb 2y ago
      Downvote and move on.
      - elktown 2y ago
        For repeat offenders, I prefer to call it out.