3 ms·
Sorry but they cannot be described as socialist because workers rights are non existent. Just because there is some protection for the native Arabs doesn't mean
by Gud 2y ago
Sorry but they cannot be described as socialist because workers rights are non existent.
Just because there is some protection for the native Arabs doesn't mean it can be "broadly described as socialist".
There is no protection for the Bangladeshis, Filipinos, Indians, etc, who are doing the work. Protecting the working class is pretty much the point of socialism.
This is a ludicrous statement.
- ern 2y agoThey’re welfare states, with three classes of residents. A slave-like underclass, disenfranchised expats, and citizens who get paid off by their royal families with generous benefits. Maybe the closest analogy is Ancient Rome?
- Gud 2y agoI don't think the underclass is living under slave like conditions though. Full disclosure, I worked in Dubai for 2 years(as a disenfranchised expat), working closely with guys from above mentioned countries. I install heavy machinery. It's true some are treated poorly, but most are there genuinely there out of free will, because they make buckets of money to send back home. One Pakistani foreman I worked with had stashed away 250k Dirhams and was going back home to start his own business. The gulf states can/could be an opportunity for the poor, see Bin Laden family for a famous example. More than criticizing the gulf states for using these people as cheap labor, the criticism should be aimed at their corrupt governments not giving opportunities to their own population. Ironically they are not even allowed inside Europe and the US. FWIW my experience in Dubai changed my views on the region to a much more nuanced one.