You're looking at AI slop because somebody made something up and had the machine riff along with it. You can very well have the LLM generate you a bunch of case

You're looking at AI slop because somebody made something up and had the machine riff along with it. You can very well have the LLM generate you a bunch of cases "proving" that it's illegal to have a pet cat or that in France everybody is legally required to smoke. In fact trademark lawyers would prefer you to believe that if you're spending $1 on like, making the trademarked product rather than giving them the dollar to "defend" your trademark that's a false economy because magically a court will tear up your trademark because you were supposed to spend all that money on lawyers. If they can argue they really believed this was true (e.g. they read nonsense hallucinated into existence by AI) they're not even lying to you, it's just super convenient that they falsely believed something which directly benefited them...