2 ms·
Not to the same extent. You also had imperialism. Just found a good write up. The economic integration was intentional post WWII. https://jstribune.com/azar-g
by KoolKat23 2y ago
Not to the same extent. You also had imperialism.
Just found a good write up. The economic integration was intentional post WWII.
https://jstribune.com/azar-gat-is-war-declining/ https://jstribune.com/azar-gat-is-war-declining/
- AlecSchueler 2y agoI know, I'm just saying those things listed can't be the basis of it since we had them already. Economic integration like with the steal and coal community is a fait point but it wasn't what was said when I responded. The claim was that it was a "rules based order" and that the rules were "treaties, International law and international institutions." No mention of economic integration. We also have imperialism today and have done since the end of WW2.
- KoolKat23 2y agoThe basis for the Bretons Woods agreements was intentionally to integrate economically and treaties post WW1 and WW2 were intentionally to stop imperialism. That was not the case before. Perhaps it occasionally has happened since but not at the scale beforehand and with plenty of roadblocks. It's like saying crime is rampant when one person commits one, it's hyperbole to say so.