Lots of people saying that this is completely obvious. I'm not so sure, but the article summary is not much help there - we are almost at the end when the resea

Lots of people saying that this is completely obvious. I'm not so sure, but the article summary is not much help there - we are almost at the end when the researcher explains what she claims the advance is. A better article would start by explaining the advance, diving deeper into it, and then following up with how she showed this. Something to think about when we're trying to communicate complex ideas.