3 ms·
Why is it so hard to understand this? Five years ago on HN stories like this would collect comments with general revulsion to this sort of surveillance. Today t
by banku_brougham 2y ago
Why is it so hard to understand this? Five years ago on HN stories like this would collect comments with general revulsion to this sort of surveillance. Today there is a troubling sentiment that "we can't have a society without unlimited time history of every person's movements available for scrutiny."
- arminiusreturns 2y ago[flagged]
- kittikitti 2y agoMost people on HN are highly networked with Big Tech which depends on surveillance data. Without it, their jobs and careers vanish. Defending surveillance doesn't come from a place of reason, it comes from a place of ignorance and fear.
- jillyboel 2y agoIt's funny how your, and the other sibling replies, all got downvoted without anyone refuting it. They know you're right, they're just angry about being called out.
- asveikau 2y ago[flagged]
- Terr_ 2y ago[flagged]
- try_the_bass 2y ago> Five years ago on HN stories like this would collect comments with general revulsion to this sort of surveillance. I'm super skeptical that this is actually true. In fact, I'm pretty sure it isn't, and you're just projecting your own positions on "HN of five years ago".