4 ms·
I think you are missing the point. I never said it's the same nor is that what I am arguing. > Anyone who finds them 'mindblowing' clearly does not have a comp
by lnenad 2y ago
I think you are missing the point. I never said it's the same nor is that what I am arguing.
> Anyone who finds them 'mindblowing' clearly does not have a complex enough use case.
What is the point of llms? If their only point is complex use cases then they're useless, let's throw them away. If their point/scope/application is wider and they're doing something for a non negligible percentage of people then who are you to gauge whether they deserve to be mindblowing to someone or not regardless of their use case?
- hansmayer 2y agoWhat is the point of LLMs? It seems nobody really knows, including the people selling them. They are a solution in search of a problem. But if you figure it out in the meanwhile, make sure to let everyone know. Personally I'd be happy with just having back Google as it was between roughly 2006-2019 (RIP) in the place of the overly verbose statistical parrots.