3 ms·
That would be horrible for workers. Let's not establish that sort of precedent; if you do the job, remote or not, you get paid equally. Even assuming a slight p
by MindBeams 2y ago
That would be horrible for workers. Let's not establish that sort of precedent; if you do the job, remote or not, you get paid equally. Even assuming a slight productivity bump, John doesn't deserve more money than Dave just because he schleps himself to the office.
- northhanover22 2y agoI disagree with that. If I do the job twice as well as someone else (twice as productive) I would expect to be paid twice as much.