3 ms·
Since to my knowledge Scheme has been replaced with Racket, is this blog out of date or is he just holding on to the old name. In any event, I've not had any pr
by hsmyers 14y ago
Since to my knowledge Scheme has been replaced with Racket, is this blog out of date or is he just holding on to the old name. In any event, I've not had any problems with the existing approach and don't see quite why this 'change' is needed. Likewise, since the Racket list is quite active and quite open, I wonder why this wasn't discussed there (or maybe I just missed it---the volume of the list is quite large). Full disclosure, my default motto for such things is "Change is evil" so that might explain my position.
EDIT: the URL for the new version of Racket is: http://download.racket-lang.org/racket-5-3-bin-i386-win32-exe.html http://download.racket-lang.org/racket-5-3-bin-i386-win32-ex...
- JoelMcCracken 14y agoScheme has not been replaced by Racket. Racket is a distinct language from Scheme. There are still many implementations of scheme besides the previous plt scheme.
- tomku 14y agoHuh? I think you're getting Scheme and PLT Scheme confused. Racket has replaced PLT Scheme, but there's a whole world of non-Racket Scheme implementations out there.