3 ms·
Or, in other words, you are a subject matter expert and are agreeing with the person you’re responding to. Quote the full argument (emphasis added): > Rule num
by latexr 2y ago
Or, in other words, you are a subject matter expert and are agreeing with the person you’re responding to. Quote the full argument (emphasis added):
> Rule number 1 and the only rule: You need to be a subject matter expert. Be it program logic or be it programming language.
You are a subject matter in program logic, just not programming language. You are supporting their point, not disagreeing.
- NitpickLawyer 2y agoI see where you're coming from. But later in the message they go > and if you do not understand the reason for the code and the programming language, you will take so much more time than if you did not even use the AI. I guess that's the part I disagree on. The programming language is largely irrelevant now is what I'm seeing. And especially the "time to first result" is orders of magnitude smaller when using AI assistants than having to rtfm/google/so every little problem I encounter in an unfamiliar language. And I am in no way stating that my code will match an expert in that field, of course.