Isn't weasel wording [1] just wonderful -- could Technically he's not completely wrong. The issue clearly was PEBCAK though. I don't feel they should singl

Isn't weasel wording [1] just wonderful -- could Technically he's not completely wrong. The issue clearly was PEBCAK though. I don't feel they should single any one person out for the lapse in security -- it really doesn't matter when the last few weeks have been a run of gaffes, from the IMO hilarious firing a technician that kept a $$$ bit of testing equipment serviced (it caught fire some days later after they were let go iirc) to the horrifying - no worries, removing the existing air gaps from previously secured networks - it could be primarily laid at the feet of an administration that's nailed up above all else -- #1 rules are for fools [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word